Tagging heavily edited pictures as photoshopped

Am I allowed to label heavily edited pictures as photoshopped or am I going to get told off again? Models like Olivia Casta are the product of FaceApp and Photoshop and should be tagged as such.

There's also an insane amount of East Asian models specifically with clearly unreal faces or bodies that should be tagged like this.

Then every single studio photography should be tagged "photoshopped", as all models gets photoshopped either mildly or heavily.

What would be the point of tagging every models photo with "photoshop"?

It's not the first time you mention Olivia Casta either, so why not just blacklist that name?

It's ok to add the "photoshopped" tag to heavily edited wallpapers if that makes you feel better.

CyberEnemyDreamer said:

Then every single studio photography should be tagged "photoshopped", as all models gets photoshopped either mildly or heavily.

What would be the point of tagging every models photo with "photoshop"?

It's not the first time you mention Olivia Casta either, so why not just blacklist that name?

There's a difference between absurdly unreal faces/bodies and skin smoothing or waist narrowing.

I mentioned her name because that's one of the ones where they're straight up trying to pass off as a whole new person whereas others just pretend their changed face is their actual face.

I just searched "Olivia Casta" on both Wallhaven and Google, and got the same result. A generic porn star. No excessive editing. Not a man being digitally resampled to resemble a woman. Not an AI program using advanced CGI to appear as a flesh-and-blood human.

Just a boring brunette with her bahonkas out. Why exactly are we supposed to get so worked up over an e-thot?

GenreLeap said:

I just searched "Olivia Casta" on both Wallhaven and Google, and got the same result. A generic porn star. No excessive editing. Not a man being digitally resampled to resemble a woman. Not an AI program using advanced CGI to appear as a flesh-and-blood human.

Just a boring brunette with her bahonkas out. Why exactly are we supposed to get so worked up over an e-thot?

He's worked up cause she's using filters to make herself look younger than she is. Also she's using another name. But she's exactly what you say, an e-thot like all the other e-thots that make themselves look younger. She isn't a porn star though, at least what I've gathered, just a nude model/bikini model.