Ultrawide	16:9	16:10	4:3	5:4
2560 × 1080	1280 × 720	1280 × 800	1280 × 960	1280 × 1024
3440 × 1440	1600 × 900	1600 × 1000	1600 × 1200	1600 × 1280
3840 × 1600	1920 × 1080	1920 × 1200	1920 × 1440	1920 × 1536
	2560 × 1440	2560 × 1600	2560 × 1920	2560 × 2048
	3840 × 2160	3840 × 2400	3840 × 2880	3840 × 3072

Wide	Ultrawide	Portrait	Square
All Wide	All Portrait
16 × 9	21 × 9	9 × 16	1 × 1
16 × 10	32 × 9	10 × 16	3 × 2
	48 × 9	9 × 18	4 × 3
			5 × 4

Low quality?

Posts: 4 · Views: 61

Cryzeen – 6 years ago14482
Wallpaper [eo18v8] deleted for low quality, there's also enigmatic adnotation saying: (background). I'm person who is learning on own mistakes to not repeat them in future. But what is wrong with this wallpaper I canno't see. It's a normal bokeh portrait photography...
Nathrezim – 6 years ago14483
I'll take this opportunity to ask about this one [76qpq9]
Gandalf – 6 years ago14486
Cryzeen I didn't delete it but I'd say the reason were some pretty significant compression artefacts in the lower right background under the arm. Kind of looks like a low res youtube video. The overall compression is pretty noticeable around the edges as well. Not saying it necessarily must be deleted but it's certainly justifiable.

Nathrezim That one is just straight up blurry. At full resolution it looks like a bad holiday snapshot. You might be able to get around it by scaling it down significantly.
Cryzeen – 6 years ago14487
Gandalf So be it ;) Thanks for fast answer.