Ultrawide	16:9	16:10	4:3	5:4
2560 × 1080	1280 × 720	1280 × 800	1280 × 960	1280 × 1024
3440 × 1440	1600 × 900	1600 × 1000	1600 × 1200	1600 × 1280
3840 × 1600	1920 × 1080	1920 × 1200	1920 × 1440	1920 × 1536
	2560 × 1440	2560 × 1600	2560 × 1920	2560 × 2048
	3840 × 2160	3840 × 2400	3840 × 2880	3840 × 3072

Wide	Ultrawide	Portrait	Square
All Wide	All Portrait
16 × 9	21 × 9	9 × 16	1 × 1
16 × 10	32 × 9	10 × 16	3 × 2
	48 × 9	9 × 18	4 × 3
			5 × 4

[REQUEST] Unstick Header Option

Posts: 7 · Views: 66

equation – 8 years ago5209
How about looking into the possibility of adding an option to the settings menu that will let users choose themselves if the header should be sticked to the top of the browserwindow or not. I for one would love to unstick it.
Gandalf – 8 years ago5213
Too many options make the settings too cluttered. You'd be pretty much the only one using it.
equation – 8 years ago5215
Gandalf said:

You'd be pretty much the only one using it.

What a biased answer. Is that judgment based on your own personal opinion? If you guys don't want it that way, then fine - just say so.
lezboyd – 8 years ago5216
The thing is, the header was unstuck at [color=#FFFF99]wallbase[/color], and we had hundreds asking for it to be stuck. So we stuck it permanently this time. It is more useful being stuck, IMHO, 'cause easy accessibility.
GamingFTW – 8 years ago5218
Just a quick thought on this. While it's true that there isn't any issue on the desktop version of the website with this, it makes the mobile version next to unusable since almost half of the screen is taken up by the header (at least that was how it was on my phone). I don't really use the mobile version much, but I've found that to be a rather big problem.

I, for one, would honestly browse much more on mobile if I had this option, but I do not know how long it'd take to implement it, or whether there are many other people who found this to be an issue.
lezboyd – 8 years ago5221
To be honest, we have not yet optimized the site for mobile use. When and when the API is out, other developers can use it to create mobile apps for various platforms. We already have a few interested devs.
Gandalf – 8 years ago5222
Yeah, the design is barely adjusted for mobile devices. I know responsive design is The Shit™, but since our primary focus are desktop wallpapers, I'm considering it a much lower priority.

equation said:

What a biased answer. Is that judgment based on your own personal opinion? If you guys don't want it that way, then fine - just say so.

It's what I think is true, I dunno if that makes me biased. I gave you reasons for the decision, so it's not just what I want, but what I believe to be in everybody's best interest. It's common for people to ask for small things to be optional. These things pile up and clutter the settings menus to the point where new users have difficulties finding anything they actually care about.

As for the header, it would absolutely make sense to have that non-sticky for smaller screens. I'll check that out.