New rule for Porn wallpapers

Can we implement a rule where all porn wallpapers have to be marked NSFW or sketchy whether there is nudity or not? We're seeing a large number not being marked despite either suggestive posing that could get you in trouble (example https://wallhaven.cc/w/m3v75m) or watermarks advertising porn websites, often with very NSFW names (like this one posted today proudly advertising www.mumslickteens.com https://wallhaven.cc/w/856zoo

What do you mean by ''that could get you in trouble''??

I think the rules adequately cover this.

Purity or flagging is how we filter wallpapers based on content. Remember to use your best judgment - If you can't decide if a wallpaper is SFW or Sketchy, mark it Sketchy.

---

SFW Images that are considered safe for work. Contain no violence or sexually suggestive content.

---

Sketchy Images with a subject in underwear, swim-wear, lingerie, latex, etc. but no genitals or (female) nipples showing. Low cut tops/High cut bottoms/Lightly provocative poses.

I think this is a case of mis-marked wallpapers

It just seems to be one user https://wallhaven.cc/user/Karl243. Do I have to go through and report every wallpaper or can some other warning be given to them?

What do you mean by ''that could get you in trouble''??

Well NSFW is not safe for work, so trouble if you opened it and were seen at work.

Added 37 minutes after

I tried reporting a few and got a comment saying no false reports lol. Teens love huge cocks is apparently safe for work.

Don't report the wallpaper, just edit the purity rating on the left-hand side.

Most welcome rule... It is becoming difficult to open the site in public , with all such suggestive pictures in general category even though non-nude

mcswan said:

Don't report the wallpaper, just edit the purity rating on the left-hand side.

Ah ty! Had no idea anyone could do that. I don't see why the admins can't warn the user or something though.

Ok, thanks. I also want to know it.