Ultrawide	16:9	16:10	4:3	5:4
2560 × 1080	1280 × 720	1280 × 800	1280 × 960	1280 × 1024
3440 × 1440	1600 × 900	1600 × 1000	1600 × 1200	1600 × 1280
3840 × 1600	1920 × 1080	1920 × 1200	1920 × 1440	1920 × 1536
	2560 × 1440	2560 × 1600	2560 × 1920	2560 × 2048
	3840 × 2160	3840 × 2400	3840 × 2880	3840 × 3072

Wide	Ultrawide	Portrait	Square
All Wide	All Portrait
16 × 9	21 × 9	9 × 16	1 × 1
16 × 10	32 × 9	10 × 16	3 × 2
	48 × 9	9 × 18	4 × 3
			5 × 4

Tag name

Posts: 10 · Views: 167

KrimzinZV – 6 years ago14498
Don't know where else to put this, but rather than blacklisting the uploaders, I'd rather blacklist the tag. What is this sort of stuff called or what should it be called?
1920 x 108037
1920 x 10807PNG
Aside from awful.
deleted – 6 years ago14499
Anime Anime Girls Artwork Digital Art
Gandalf – 6 years ago14500
KrimzinZV said:

Aside from awful.

Matters of personal taste aside, maybe you should clarify what exactly you are referring to?
whismerhill – 6 years ago14502
I think he's referring to the "picture in picture"

those could also have the tag blurred
KrimzinZV – 6 years ago14511
whismerhill said:

I think he's referring to the "picture in picture"

This, sorry I thought it was more obvious.
jpdokter – 6 years ago14531
KrimzinZV

Is there a picture-in-picture tag? I am not seeing them in this case, but you can add this to your tag blacklist in the options, and then assign the tag you've blacklisted to the wallpapers.
jpdokter – 6 years ago14532
jpdokter said:

KrimzinZV Is there a picture-in-picture tag? I am not seeing them in this case, but you can add this to your tag blacklist in the options, and then assign the tag you've blacklisted to the wallpapers.

I made the picture-in-picture tag. Have fun :D
KrimzinZV – 6 years ago14538
jpdokter but then the problem becomes something else. Uploading No low-quality edits (rotated, mirrored or picture-in-picture images).

So would this rule apply or not? When you get down to it, it's just a cut out of a character (they didn't make) and stuck onto another image.
jpdokter – 6 years ago14566
KrimzinZV said:

jpdokter but then the problem becomes something else. Uploading No low-quality edits (rotated, mirrored or picture-in-picture images). So would this rule apply or not? When you get down to it, it's just a cut out of a character (they didn't make) and stuck onto another image.

I am no moderator, but I can see where this is a subjective view of art. The problem is that these wallpapers can be explained as artistic as well as "picture in picture" (therefor rubbish). Gandalf, I'd like your opinion on this too.

The core thing to realise is that every software solution here depends on the input and actions from the community. We all got to give and take a bit. If you depend on blacklisting tags, you also depend on the community to add those tags, and you're accepting the possibility of missing some wallpapers because of incorrect tagging, or looking right despite being "picture in picture".

I do not think that these wallpapers can really be judged as "low quality edit", they don't seem to be scaled, and it's not a lazy copy-paste job. So, I'm lead to believe that someone put forth (a lot of) effort to make this, and thus can not be seen as "low quality edit".

But as I said, all of this is subjective.
Gandalf – 6 years ago14567
jpdokter said:

I do not think that these wallpapers can really be judged as "low quality edit", they don't seem to be scaled, and it's not a lazy copy-paste job. So, I'm lead to believe that someone put forth (a lot of) effort to make this, and thus can not be seen as "low quality edit".

I agree with this. The "picture in picture" rule was added because at the time we had quite a few uploads that were extremely lazy in that regard. They just took one photo as a background and than slapped a couple of others on top of it. Basically they were just low-quality edits and we explicitly added them as an example of the general rule against low effort content.