This is sketchy?

Hello

Just curious to know why this wallpaper was sticked as sketchy:

5846 x 381956

Anime makes people so desensitized it's not even funny.

...what?

Added 2017-04-20 15:47:38

From the "Rules":

Sketchy

• Images with a subject in underwear, swimwear, lingerie, latex, etc. but no genitals or (female) nipples showing.
• Images containing profanity, drugs/drug references, war and death.
• Non-graphic violence such as blood spatter, and images of guns in use.
• Controversial political/religious symbols such as Nazism.

So maybe I'm blind or something but I don't see any of that.

Well let's see:

1. The Stockings
2. Legs
3. Miniskirt up
4. A Glimpse of Bare Bottom
5. Young Anime Girl in mild Erotic-Pose.

Bare bottom? miniskirt up? there's no way you can tell from that angle if she is wearing something or not, unless she is wearing a diaper-like panties there's no way you could see.

Her "mini" skirt is it's pretty much of the length that anyone ever seen an anime in his life is used to, that's "normal length" in anime standards, also it's up? it's barely out of place due to her leg's position, it's BARELY "up" and not purposely(she isn't actively lifting it), nor it's showing anything than leg's skin anyway.

The stockings? what in the world is wrong with her stockings?

It would be "sketchy" if I was a 14teen year old random horny boy, then yes, the kind of boy that gets horny at the slightest cleavage or(in this case) some extra leg-showing.

Is this really the metric this sites uses? horny-teenager-level ?

Hah! I did see your picture shortly after you had uploaded it and I actually did consider tagging it as Sketchy. However, since "slightly bare bottom" was my only argument and not a very good one, I decided against it and moved on. Don't feel bad though. For most people, the sight of stockings alone is enough to consider something Sketchy. Add the visibility of one whole leg, side-bottom and you got yourself a whole package. In Japan, seeing girls in stockings or any other type of knee-highs, is completely normal and not considered as a sex clothing. Cultural differences, all I can say.

Well, whatever I agree or not, I'm grateful you actually put the effort of writing a proper response instead of dismissing my question with

"Anime makes people so desensitized it's not even funny."

Coming from the site admin/developer nonetheless.

Thank you for you time.

I'm the one who marked it as sketchy. Mainly due to the amount of side butt.

That's a lot of side butt.

But yeah, I wouldn't worry too much about it. A wall being marked as sketchy isn't a death sentence. Everyone, including guests, can still view it no problem (unless they have sketchy walls disabled of course).

We're trying to make sure everything that is SFW is as close to universally accepted as such. In other words, all SFW uploads should be able to be used in a work/(semi-)professional environment.

Can't we just ban all of this stupid kawaii anime wallpaper third-class-art? Since most people are searching for quality in here.

Yes you are right. I'm searching here for quality Porn....

Semen said:

Can't we just ban all of this stupid kawaii anime wallpaper third-class-art? Since most people are searching for quality in here.

Your avatar is third-class-art.

If there ever was a constructive side to this thread it's now obviously gone so I'll close this before it gets out of hand…