Ultrawide	16:9	16:10	4:3	5:4
2560 × 1080	1280 × 720	1280 × 800	1280 × 960	1280 × 1024
3440 × 1440	1600 × 900	1600 × 1000	1600 × 1200	1600 × 1280
3840 × 1600	1920 × 1080	1920 × 1200	1920 × 1440	1920 × 1536
	2560 × 1440	2560 × 1600	2560 × 1920	2560 × 2048
	3840 × 2160	3840 × 2400	3840 × 2880	3840 × 3072

Wide	Ultrawide	Portrait	Square
All Wide	All Portrait
16 × 9	21 × 9	9 × 16	1 × 1
16 × 10	32 × 9	10 × 16	3 × 2
	48 × 9	9 × 18	4 × 3
			5 × 4

Feedback from a new user

Posts: 3 · Views: 68

shadomare – 7 years ago10686
The problem (programmer point of view here) is that detecting duplicates is really, really complicated, it involves complex imagery algorithms, that are both CPU and storage expansive.

I guess the current detection system checks for file hashes but hashes change if you just remove the EXIF metadata for example, whereas the image data are the same, imagine the case when the image has been re-encoded...
Cryzeen – 7 years ago10690
Damn it, I said I don't want to discourage you.. and yet I did.
Gandalf – 7 years ago10692
The current duplicate detection is crap. Better duplicate detection is on the way but as always it takes time.

Ethereal Sorry you got frustrated, I can understand. Thanks for your feedback, we appreciate it.
Last updated 7 years ago