CountUP@Numbers

FuriouZ said:

#64

A power of two and you went with a war ship. I am so disappointed right now…

Meawhile I got nothing for #67.

67 blossoms to counter the warship

2048 x 130817

68 hexagons

1920 x 108040PNG

Added 2015-07-27 11:14:58

69 on the hull (left side)

[n6ke87]

number 70

3000 x 21974

OK then, 71 & 72, too :p

[4899mo]

9 Octagons, and 9 * 8 = 72

1920 x 120012

Also, 73 (bottom left arc)

1920 x 108030PNG

Using mathematical operations is a bit tricky here. There are almost unlimited posibilities if I use picture where there are more numbers. Example:

1920 x 10803

Here we go: 83-7-2=74

Is it still OK?

(another counting from this wall: 40+20+(7*2)=74 and then I can have also 65+10 for 75 and so on...)

As long as they are visible, and a single operator is used throughout, it is OK.

Its when you go all supercomputer and complex that it becomes a problem.

OK

Dude, I edited that reply just minutes ago.

Anyway... Here is number 76:

2661 x 171312

lezboyd: Yes, I was a little bit quick this time :-)

77

1680 x 105015

@WallpaperManiac : That does not count. The number has to be IN the image.

Look at the Plate

77+ONE=78

1600 x 12006

I'd like to know if it is OK like that?

kejsirajbek said:

Using mathematical operations is a bit tricky here. There are almost unlimited posibilities if I use picture where there are more numbers. Example: 1920 x 10800 Here we go: 83-7-2=74
Is it still OK? (another counting from this wall: 40+20+(7*2)=74 and then I can have also 65+10 for 75 and so on...)

lezboyd said:

As long as they are visible, and a single operator is used throughout, it is OK. Its when you go all supercomputer and complex that it becomes a problem.

I rethought it and I guess we can't avoid allowing this but should establish some rules, e.g. "every number in the picture has to be summed up/multiplied (not only a selection)"

Added 2015-07-29 02:21:59

M79 [0wmk96]

Lets leave the maths rule as something "intuitive without being too technical". Just remember, too many technicalities and the fun is gone...and we are doing this for fun, right? Points at Spammy SPam Section

kejsirajbek said:

77+ONE=78 1600 x 12002 I'd like to know if it is OK like that?

Actually i can see there 1-77 lol. Anyways, don't go too crazy. Don't use maths, the needed number had to be IN the picture.

80

2250 x 11379

I mean, what about this:

1920 x 120015PNG

Yeah, as I said, it has to be intuitive for everyone, not convoluted logic.

SO, the next post has to be 81, not 82. That does not count.

So, number 81 here:

1280 x 8333

22+(6*10)=82

2560 x 16001

83 Bismuth

[477x53]

Periodic table of Elements has been used before, but if I remember correctly it was another image. If periodic tables are used, at least lets make sure the same image is not repeated twice.