kejsirajbek I did read the rules and followed them the the best of my knowledge. I'll give you that half of the images staff deleted were made using screenshots of media shown in the early 2000s/2010s. (Two of which were animated.) Which I would argue doesn't make them low quality, just not 2020s quality. (Which I guess is what you lot actually want, in which case, please be clearer about that; 'high quality' is subjective and changing as fast as technology does.) One seems to have been deleted because the creator was trying to get live action characters to match an animated character in quality, so it looks a little rough. The others seem to have been flagged for adding grunge or parchment texturing, which, again, was common in wallpapers in the early 2000s and into the 2010s. Two of the images deleted were drawings, although one, I realised belatedly, did have a large, although see-through, watermark on it. I'm happy to argue each picture separately, but since you've come to tell me off on my profile, and I'm short on time today, this works fine.
Also: "Max 5pics/set (game, movie etc.) at once." is not in the rules, at all, anywhere. The rule you're misquoting is "A maximum of 5 images per set (photo shoot) are allowed." which goes on to clarify a particular subject in the same setting.
kejsirajbek Here's an 'excuse': Your rules are unclear and subjective, your attempt to publicly call me out and then refuse to engage in a conversation is immature, and the inability for your users to delete their own damn account is LITERAL BULLSHIT.
Upload into correct category. Max 5pics/set (game, movie etc.) at once. No low quality uploads. Read the rules and follow them.
kejsirajbek I did read the rules and followed them the the best of my knowledge. I'll give you that half of the images staff deleted were made using screenshots of media shown in the early 2000s/2010s. (Two of which were animated.) Which I would argue doesn't make them low quality, just not 2020s quality. (Which I guess is what you lot actually want, in which case, please be clearer about that; 'high quality' is subjective and changing as fast as technology does.) One seems to have been deleted because the creator was trying to get live action characters to match an animated character in quality, so it looks a little rough. The others seem to have been flagged for adding grunge or parchment texturing, which, again, was common in wallpapers in the early 2000s and into the 2010s. Two of the images deleted were drawings, although one, I realised belatedly, did have a large, although see-through, watermark on it. I'm happy to argue each picture separately, but since you've come to tell me off on my profile, and I'm short on time today, this works fine. Also: "Max 5pics/set (game, movie etc.) at once." is not in the rules, at all, anywhere. The rule you're misquoting is "A maximum of 5 images per set (photo shoot) are allowed." which goes on to clarify a particular subject in the same setting.
Batsutousai you've been warned. No excuses
kejsirajbek Here's an 'excuse': Your rules are unclear and subjective, your attempt to publicly call me out and then refuse to engage in a conversation is immature, and the inability for your users to delete their own damn account is LITERAL BULLSHIT.