Broken rule (overly sexual)

Posts: 103 · Views: 4198
  • 21327

    So a shot from behind with emphasis on the hair is now considered "Overly sexual"? The model is simply standing straight, no bent over, stretching, spread legs etc.. None of the overly sexual poses described in the rule! Can someone please explain?

    https://wallhaven.cc/w/ym32gg

  • 21330

    lumberjacck said:

    So a shot from behind with emphasis on the hair is now considered "Overly sexual"? The model is simply standing straight, no bent over, stretching, spread legs etc.. None of the overly sexual poses described in the rule! Can someone please explain?

    https://wallhaven.cc/w/ym32gg

    It's become completely arbitrary again, I just had 2 taken down for "Overly Sexual" One was borderline, the other wasn't. These guys have no clue how to enforce this rule even though it's been spelled out pretty well.

Message