I strongly recommend setting an area for AI art.

Posts: 15 · Views: 700
  • 30750

    I strongly recommend setting an area for AI art.

  • 30751

    Agree, no tagging too affect the senses, not everyone loves to see the AI.

    Last updated
  • 30752

    As I've already stated in the following threads: https://wallhaven.cc/forums/thread/3122 https://wallhaven.cc/forums/thread/3255

    AI Art is simply what's popular and faddish right now. People were demanding separate filters and censorship when Cyberpunk 2077 came out, they're demanding censorship of AI art right now, and I'm sure we'll soon see people complaining about screenshots from Hogwarts Legacy and STALKER 2 in the not-too-distant future. Just sit tight and wait, and eventually the influx will slow down and be replaced by something else.

  • 30786

    GenreLeap said:

    AI Art is simply what's popular and faddish right now. People were demanding separate filters and censorship when Cyberpunk 2077 came out, they're demanding censorship of AI art right now, and I'm sure we'll soon see people complaining about screenshots from Hogwarts Legacy and STALKER 2 in the not-too-distant future. Just sit tight and wait, and eventually the influx will slow down and be replaced by something else.

    I will be honest, I don't agree with that if only because of one issue. The Cyberpunk 2077 is reliant on artists, AI art isn't. This flood isn't going away because AI art ends up being rather simple to produce and will likely be automated (if it isn't already), where as actual art isn't.

  • 30874

    Alx said:

    If you are not a fan of "AI art", just go to https://wallhaven.cc/settings/browsing and add AI art to the tag blacklist box.

    DOES NOT WORK,

    That would only work if people respect the tagging system. I've found countless AI uploaders not tagging the pictures as AI for a reason I can only predict as such:

    #1 they want them to appear as if they are hand made (outright lying) #2 they don't know it's AI art (which I highly doubt)

    I don't care if you like AI art, just don't pretend it's something else, also "just block" works as an honor system and should be enforced with either bans or removal of accounts/uploads if tag system is abused.

    If this is hard to understand and you don't know why people don't want to see AI art, think of it as if it was furry porn. not tagging that as furry porn would cause all accounts who want furry porn not to be seen will see it because said uploader doesn't respect other people and is lying or is lazy, neither a virtue btw. (not saying ai art is furry porn, had to clarify since this is the internet)

  • 30882

    powerhip: I would highly appreciate if you would tag an AI generated wallpaper as an ''AI art'' if you spot some without it. There are not 'countless' of them I think.

  • 30901

    kejsirajbek said:

    powerhip: I would highly appreciate if you would tag an AI generated wallpaper as an ''AI art'' if you spot some without it. There are not 'countless' of them I think.

    I've done so whenever I find one, I found atleast 12 or so last time I was online and tagged them all, also commented on the uploader's profile to tag AI art as such (there was also someone else already commented to them about not tagging their uploads)

    Will tag whenever I see one (and I will for sure make sure it also is, they aren't that hard to spot)

  • 30910

    Alx said:

    If you are not a fan of "AI art", just go to https://wallhaven.cc/settings/browsing and add AI art to the tag blacklist box.

    I have done so and so far I have been having AI Art slip through the blacklist when it comes to subscriptions...

    NSFWYou need to be logged in to view this wallpaper.

    This a work that has been posted by ThorRagnarok. On my blacklists are "AI art", "Stable Diffusion", and "Pastania"... for the last few days, ThorRagnarok has been posting a portfolio of this "Pastania"'s work, among other actual photos. It is why I consider the user blacklist too broad for my subscriptions given that is the only thing that seems to work. I have no issue with ThorRagnarok other posts... just the "AI art". My tag blacklist should cover that, but it doesn't seem to work at all with my subscriptions.

    kejsirajbek said:

    powerhip: I would highly appreciate if you would tag an AI generated wallpaper as an ''AI art'' if you spot some without it. There are not 'countless' of them I think.

    I am sure that helps and I have been doing so with work that doesn't seem to be properly tagged but I don't think that powerhip is wrong to assume that it is countless. It been pretty close to that given that to use Stable Diffusion is only really a minor paywall to create alot of images. I said it before and I will say it again, this flood is not going to stop unless wallhaven does something against such image.

    Last updated
  • 30914

    If the filters don't work, then the filters might need an update? There is alo a lot of people who actually like AI art. There are now more options for people who wants wallpapers.

  • 30916

    So I would like to also perhaps weigh in on this one. Firstly I want to start by saying I don't dislike AI art particularly, actually some of them are quite cool and I even favorited many of them.

    However, I do feel it is becoming a bit overly used imo. To me its becoming cheap and just too easy to flood the site with them, its as if the uploaders are just now flooding them with easy generated one-click images for, I dnt know, the gratification of getting lots of image views on their uploads . . . (this is just what it sometimes looks like, I am not saying this is the intention from the uploaders)

    and saying to just add blacklists is not a fool proof solution, as many have highlighted here the flaws in that solution. I use the tag subscriptions a lot to discover wallpapers, one of my subscriptions "illustration" used to have a nice mix of fantasy sci-fi and art wallpapers. Now its just bombarded by weird quality easy generated wallpapers. (artistically they do sometimes look cool, but the quality is always weird)

    I don't know what the solution (or compromise) really is, But I do think maybe the moderators could give this topic a serious thought. I would suggest maybe a daily limit on Ai art uploads similar to what we have with limiting the amount of uploads from a similar set/photoshoot.

  • 30963

    IssacS said:

    AI art ends up being rather simple to produce and will likely be automated (if it isn't already), where as actual art isn't.

    Sorry to single you out on this (no personal hate) but this is what's wrong with a bunch of people here, generating good images is not easy at all & you dont complain about bad photo's or drawings either so why complain about peoples "my first generated images"?? people need to calm down & all wallhaven needs to do is make it clear that good tagging is important.

  • 30964

    Banana1234 said:

    IssacS said:

    AI art ends up being rather simple to produce and will likely be automated (if it isn't already), where as actual art isn't.

    Sorry to single you out on this (no personal hate) but this is what's wrong with a bunch of people here, generating good images is not easy at all & you dont complain about bad photo's or drawings either so why complain about peoples "my first generated images"?? people need to calm down & all wallhaven needs to do is make it clear that good tagging is important.

    Lemme chip in right here. The only real problem people have with AI art is the quality. If it wasn't so obvious that the wallpaper is some artistically challenged person's attempt at creating a wall, AI art wouldn't have any haters, trust me. I've seen several AI art that I love, some I've used for a very long time, but you can't put up something that looks weird and unsettling and try to guilt trip people into liking it, IF YOUR ART IS GOOD, NO ONE'S GONNA HATE. And that brings me to the other topic, you can't compare peoples' drawings and photographs to AI art because one is a product of someone's hard work and effort, and the other is not, that being said, bad drawings and photographs are nowhere near as much as the crappy AI art here is, and that's one thing I love about wallhaven, I've hardly ever come across any walls that are "bad", its either there's an unwritten rule that people subconsciously respect and follow, or the admins have a way of screening those walls out cuz all the walls here are premium, that is until recently, with the massive influx of "you know what". My main point is, if your "my first generated images" aren't up to snuff, keep them to yourself, and keep working until you have art that's worth sharing, quality is better than quantity anytime.

  • 30967

    Banana1234 said:

    Generating good images is not easy at all & you dont complain about bad photo's or drawings either so why complain about peoples "my first generated images"??

    On a number of merits to be frank but the thing that I am concerned with the most is the fact that it devalues what others put in time and work to do. The fact that the site is dealing with a glut of this content over a matter of weeks is part of that devaluing. I don't welcome it.

    all wallhaven needs to do is make it clear that good tagging is important.

    On that we agree, the rules are not clear here.

    Last updated

Message