"Pornstar" tag needs review.

Posts: 7 · Views: 232
  • 19567

    The pornstar tag, by itself, is merely an inferred profession. It is not actually an image attribute, let alone necessarily an NSFW (red) attribute.

    I would suggest either entirely removing this image tag since it is not a "visible attribute" or at least reduce it to Sketchy(yellow) at worst.

  • 19568

    I disagree. A pornstar is a woman (man) known playing in a porn movie. It's strictly NSFW. I can't see any reason to delete or modificate this tag.

  • 19579

    It's your call, of course. But consider this, is a normal G-rated photo of "pornstar" (tagged) without any revealing content automatically a NSFW photo?

  • 19592

    I still can't see a problem if a SFW wallpaper has a NSFW tag. There are hundreds or even thousands of them here...

  • 19595

    Maybe it's just me, but I look at ALL of the tags for wallpapers in judging it's "SFW" nature. If any of them are NSFW, I would expect the wallpaper is now rated NSFW. Example: Nipslip, Nude, etc. Similarly, if any of the tags are "Sketchy", I have to assume the whole picture is sketchy. It's not an average of the number of red/yellow/green tags.

    Movies and TV are similar, it only takes one violent scene or one F-bomb to get a movie rated PG-13 or R. The entire film doesn't have to be full of that sort of content to warrant the parental advisory.

    By marking an image with an NSFW tag (like all pornstar have and even the keyword "pornstar" has), it implies that all photos with pornstars in them are automatically NSFW. Even if they are sitting in a sunny field fully dressed. It's almost like pinning a "Scarlet Letter" on them - a form of shaming.

    Is there some other functional rationale of having all pornstar actresses names automatically be red?

  • 19599

    What's the difference? Changing the order of the addends does not change the sum.

Message